Team Leadership in Organization Based on Organizational Role and National Culture (Case Study: Isfahan State University)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 PhD student in Management, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Organizations are now facing a lot of challenges such as maintaining quality despite depletion of resources, improved financial management, obtaining further research back up, expansion of new skills, fixing clear objectives, assisting members in confronting increasing work pressure, keeping motivation and morale, initiative in training and research and excessive increase of information. The purpose of this article is to help academic executives promise a brighter future (that looks gloomy nowadays), since the leaders are bound to invigorate their staff so they could cope with challenges more enthusiastically. The most remarkable merit an organization could have in a competitive world which is in need of resources, is team leadership. This kind of leadership is a process for progressing expertise and individual growth and it can change organizational environment for the sake of all the mentioned conformities with resource depletion, global competition, flexible supply and expansive demands of the founders who seek more efficiency. For this reason, this article studies team leadership in state universities of Isfahan after a review of team leadership theory.

Keywords

Collins, J. (2000). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap and others don’t. (pp. 34-46). New York,NY: Harper Collins Publishers ,Inc.
Drucker, P. F. (2002). Managing in the next society. (pp. 56-58).New York: ST, Martins Press.
Jessup, H. (1990). Determinants of shared leadership in management teams. International Journal of  Leadership  Studies, 1(5), 64-85.
Heifetz, R. A. (2000). Leadership without easy answers. (pp. 88-90). Cambridge, DC:
Police  Executive Research Forum.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). Improving intraorganizational communication: A lesson from Japanese management. Communication Quarterly, 30(40), 35-40.
Kearney, R. C. , and Hays, S. W. (2005). Labor-manager relations and Participative decision-making: Toward a new paradigm. Public Administration  Review, 54(1), 44-51.
Kim, S. (2002). Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 231-291.
Lau, C. M. , and Lim, E. W. (2002). The intervening effects of participation on the relationship between procedural justice and managerial performance. The British Accounting Review, 34(1), 45-47.
Lawler, E. E. , and Galbraith, J. (2001). New roles for the staff: Strategic support and services. In organization for the future: The new logic for managing complex
organizations, edited by J, Galbraith. (pp. 112-145). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ming, L. (2006). Workers participation in management and firm performance: Evidence from large and medium-sized Chinese industrial enterprise. Review of  Radical Political Economics, 36(3), 113-115.
Misumi, J. (2002). The development of Japan of the performance-maintenance  (PM) theory of leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 213-218.
Ospina, S. , and Yaroni, A. (2003). Understanding cooperative behavior in labor management cooperation: A theory- building exercise. Pubic Administration  Review, 63(4), 455-469.
Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. (pp. 23-24).New York: Avon.
Pascale, R. T. ,  and Athos, A. G. (2001). The art of Japanese management: Applications for American executives. (pp. 22-26).New York: Warner Books.
Ray, D. , and Bronstein, H. (2005). Teaming up. (pp. 34). San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.
Sattler, R.C. (2004). Roles of perceived leadership styles and  rewards in the practice of total quality management. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 25(1), 24-40.
Seibold,  D. R. ,  and Shea, B. C. (2001). Participation and decision making.  (pp. 664- 703). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stewart, L. P. , Gudykunst, W. B. , Ting-Toomey, S. ,  and Nishida, T. (2006).  The  effects of decision-making style in openness and satisfaction within  Japanese organizations. Communication Monographs, 53, 236-251.
Tennenbaum,  R. ,  and Schmidt, W. H. (1985). How to choose a leadership pattern.  Harvard Business Review, 36(2), 95-101.
Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
April 2009
Pages 191-219
  • Receive Date: 28 October 2008
  • Revise Date: 21 March 2009
  • Accept Date: 03 March 2009