Typology of Strategy Formation in Economic Public Organizations of Iran

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Management, Sahid Chamran University, Ahvaz

2 MA of Commercial Management

Abstract

Strategic management literature is dominated by a special approach. Introduction of other approaches in this field and recognition of their applications are great steps in strategy formation. These efforts help pubic organizations to equip themselves with particular necessities of such an approach. Also private and non-profit sectors can choose an appropriate approach in their relationship with pubic organizations. This research intends to identify the current situation of strategy formation in public organizations which are active in Iran’s economic domain, in order to provide a suitable model for developing a strategy for them by recognizing their demands. Therefore, remarkable models of typology of strategy formation process have been introduced and Whittington model has been selected.
The selected model introduces 4 generic approaches: (classic, evolutionary, procedural and systemic) in the form of deliberated or emergent strategies, and uni or multi-purpose strategies.
To collect data, questionnaires were administered and the results were analyzed in two phases. One was by non-parametric statistic techniques (Friedman and Kendall tests) and the other parametric statistic techniques (ANOVA). The result of analyses shows that strategy formation process in economic public organizations of Iran follow procedural, evolutionary, systemic and classic approach respectively.

Keywords

Acar, W. & Melcher, A. J. & Aupperle, K. E. (1987), “Organizational Processes and Strategic Postures: Cross‑Classification or Continuum?”, Academy of Management Proceedings, annual conference of the International Society for General Systems Research in Phila, Pp. J70‑J84.
Ansoff, H. I. (1965), Corporate Strategy, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Id. (1991), “Critique of Henry Mintzberg's "The Design School"”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 6, Pp. 449-461.
Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966), The social construction of reality, New York: Doubleday.
Chaffee, E. E. (1985), “Three Models of Strategy”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, Pp. 89-98.
Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and structure, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963), A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Emery, F. E. & Trist, E. L. (1965), “Causal Texture of Organizational Environments”,Human Relations, Vol. 18, No. 1, Pp. 21-32.
Galbraith, C. & Schendel, D. (1983), “An Empirical Analysis of Strategy Types”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, Pp. 153- 173.
Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic action & social structure: the problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, Pp. 481-510.
Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1988), Organizational Ecology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harmon, M. M. (1981), Action Theory for Public Administration, New York: Longman.
Hart, S. & Catherine B., (1994), “How Strategy-Making Processes Can Make a Difference”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, Pp. 251- 269.
Hofer, C. W. (1973), “Some preliminary research on patterns of strategic behavior”,Academy of Management Proceedings, Pp. 46-59.
Keeley, M. (1980), “Organizational analogy: A comparison of organismic and social contract models”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, Pp. 337-362.
Lauriol, J. (1997), “Une analyse des representations de la strategie et de son management dans la production”, ouvrages en langue francaise Management International, Vol. 2, No. 1, Pp. 51-66.
Levine, C. H., Backoff, R. W., Cahoon, A. R. & Siffin, W. J. (1975), “Organizational Design: A Post Minnowbrook Perspective for the 'New' Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, Pp. 425-435.
Martinet, A. C. (1993), “Une nouvelle approche de la strategie”, Revue Francaise de Gestion, Vol. 93, No. Mars-Avril-Mai, Pp. 62-72.
Id. (1994), “Management strategique et politique generate: I'Etat de I'Art”, XII Journees nationales des IAE, in Annales du Management, CREGO-IAE Montpellier, T. 2, Pp. 11-28.
Miles, R. H. & Cameron, K. S. (1982), Coffin nails and corporate strategies, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Miles, R. E., Snow C. C., Meyer, A. D. & Coleman, H. J. (1978), “Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, Pp. 546-562.
Mintzberg, H. (1973), “Strategy-Making in Three Modes”, California Management Review, Vol. XVI, No. 2, Pp. 44-53.
Id. (1987), “Crafting Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65, No. 4, Pp. 66-75.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (1998), Strategy Safari, New York: Prentice Hall.
Nutt, P. C. & Backoff, R. W. (1993), “Organizational Publicness and its Implications for Strategic Management”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 209-231.
Nutt, P. C. & Backoff, R. W. (1995), “Strategy for Public and Third-Sector Organizations”,Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 5, No. 2, Pp. 189-211.
Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Firms, New York, Free Press and Macmillan.
Id. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
Whittington, R. (2001), What is Strategy and does it matter?, London: South-Western CENGAGE Learning.
Williamson, O. E. (1991), “Strategizing, economizing and economic organization”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, No. 2, Pp.75-94.
  • Receive Date: 08 March 2011
  • Revise Date: 21 March 2011
  • Accept Date: 04 July 2011