Identifying and Determining Customer Satisfaction Criteria in Research and Technology Organizations (RTOs); Case Study: Research Institute of Petroleum Industry

Author

Ph.D. Student of Management, Tehran University, Tehran

Abstract

KIBS have been developed in close interaction with their clients (client orientation) because their services are intangible and often information and consumer-oriented. Therefore the quality of the services in KIBS should be examined from customers’ viewpoints. Research and Technology Organizations are one kind of KIBS. Hence, customer satisfaction is the central focus of academic institutes. Meanwhile, measuring customer satisfaction in KIBS is so difficult and complicated but it is essential.
In order to define the scope of customer satisfaction in Research and Technology Organizations, this study has used case study methodology and identified and determined the customer satisfaction criteria and then quantified them. Finally, thirteen criteria have been identified as customer satisfaction criteria in Research and Technology Organizations. Then by using exploratory factorial analysis, they were divided into two factorial categories and based on confirmatory factorial analysis, factor loadings of those criteria were confirmed.

Keywords

بازرگان هرندی، عباس (1387)، «روش تحقیق آمیخته: رویکردی برتر برای مطالعات مدیریت»، دانش مدیریت، سال 21، شماره 81، صص 19-36.
راش، هاوارد (1379)، برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک مؤسسات تحقیق و تکنولوژی: رویکردی تطبیقی، ترجمه سید حبیب‌الله طباطبائیان، تهران: مؤسسه آموزش و تحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی.
کلاین، پل (1380)، راهنمای آسان تحلیل عاملی، ترجمه سیدجلال صدرالسادات و اصغر مینایی، تهران:  سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت).
Adamson, C. (1994), “How and Waste Money Measuring Customer Satisfaction”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 4, No. 5, Pp. 9-12.
Eccles, G. & Durand, P. (1997), “Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Employee Attitude at Forte Hotels”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 7, No. 6, Pp. 290-291.
Haataja, M. (2005), “Development of Competitiveness of Knowledge-intensive Services”, A paper presented at the ISPIM Conference "The Role of Knowledge in Innovation Management", Porto, Portugal, Pp. 19-26.
Harrison, T. (1991), “Customer satisfaction measures”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 1, No. 3, Pp. 153-157.
Harte, H. G. & Dale, B. G. (1995), “Improving Quality in Professional Service Organizations: A Review of the Key Issues”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 5, No. 3, Pp. 34-44.
Hillabrant, W. & Earp, J. (1997), Measuring Customer Satisfaction, A Resource Guide for Vocational Rehabilitation Programs Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives.
Kelsey, K. & Bond, J. A. (2001), “A Model for Measuring Customer Satisfaction Within an Academic Center of Excellence”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 11, No. 5, Pp. 359-367.
Laaksolahti, A. (2005), Measuring Organizational Capabilities in the Engineering and Consulting Industry, Master’s Thesis Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology.
Little, A. D. (2010), Transforming Public R&D for a Post-Recession World, http://www.adlittle.com/uploads/tx_extthoughtleadership/ADL_Research_Technology_Institutes.pdf
Pudney, R. (1994), “Creating Customer Satisfaction through Partnership”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 4, No. 3, Pp. 53-56.
Scott, D. G. (2003), Customer Satisfaction for Professional Services Group, Inc.: Development of an Online Customer Satisfaction Survey, Master of Science thesis, The Graduate College University of Wisconsin – Stout May.
Wirtz, J. (2001), “Improving the Measurement of Customer Satisfaction: A Test of Three Methods and Reduce Halo”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 11, No. 2, Pp. 99-112.
Wisniewski, M. (2000), “Using SERVQUAL and Assess Customer Satisfaction with Public Sector Services”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 11, No. 6, Pp. 380-388.
Volume 5, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
April 2011
Pages 201-222
  • Receive Date: 16 March 2011
  • Revise Date: 21 March 2011
  • Accept Date: 05 July 2011