The Image Theory and Its Use in Individual and Organizational Decision-Making

Authors

1 Faculty member of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD student in Business Management, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

A brief look at both individual and organizational activities shows that decision-making is an inseparable part of each. Experts have attempted to explain the quality and cause of this important phenomenon. The result is the descriptive and prescriptive approaches that have looked upon decision-making from two different standpoints.
One theory which in mid - eighties and by adopting a descriptive approach defied other prescriptive models and views was the image theory. This is an attempt to explain the manner of real decision-making by individuals. According to this, the decision-maker has images of himself, his past, present and future. The way these images develop, their transformation and their interrelationships form the main bases of decision-making at both individual and organizational levels. The image theory takes decision-making as the result of how the structure, combination, coordination and cohesion of "self-image", projectiveness, planned image, and "executing image" are formed.

Keywords

- Beach, L. R. & Mitchel, T. R. ( 1987). “Image Theory: Principles, Goals, and Plans In Decision Making”Acta Psychologica.
- Beth Azar (1999). “Decision Researcher Split, but prolifit”, American Psychologies Association.
- Elliott, Taryn (2005). “Expert Decision Making in Naturalistic Environments”, Australian Governance: Department of Defense. 
- Gioia, D.A. & Manz,C.C. ( 1985). “Linking Cognition and Behavior: A Script Processing Interpretation of Vicarious Learning”, Academy of Management Review, No.10
- Greenberg (2003). “Ision Making In Organization”, Prentice Hall.
- Leedom, Denniss K. (2004). “The analytic representation of sense making and knowledge management within a military C2 organization”, United state air force research laboratory.
- Lord, Robert G. & Foti, Roseanne J. (1986). “Schema Theories, Information Processing, and Organizational Behavior”, The Thinking Organization, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Marttunen, Mika & Suomalainen, Merja (2004). “Participatory and Multiobjective Development of Water Course Regulation Alternatives from Stakeholders Prefrences”, Finnish Environment Institute, Finland.
- Mitchell, Terence R. (1986). Rediker, Kenneth J. & Beach Lee Roy, “Image Theory and Organization Decision Making”, The Thinking Organization, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Morrell, Kevin (2003). “Virtues, Images, Choice and Ethics”, 7th European Business Ethics Network Conference in Cambridge, LoughboroughUniversity.
- Morrel K., Loan J. & Wilkinson A. ( 2001). “Lee and Mitchell’s Unfolding Model of Employee Turnover”, BusinessSchool.
- Narayaran & zhang ( 2000). “making Decision”, Prentice Hall.
- Nelson, Kim A. (2004). ”Consumer Decision Making and Image Theory: Undestanding Value-Laden Decision”, Jornal of Consumer Psychology, No.14 (1&2)
- Patalano, Roberta (2003). ”Beyond rationality: Images as guide-lines to choice”, Working paper series, University of Torino.
- Sandoval, Angela (2005). ”The Influence of Organizational Culture on Situation Awareness and Decision Making in a Simulated Peacekeeping Task Invironment”, PhD Dissertation in Industrial Engineering, Graduate Faculty of TexasTechUniversity.
- Shanteau, J. (2001). “Encyclopedia of psychology and behavior science”, Wiley.
- Schwarts, David G. & Teen, Dov (2001). ”Intelligent agent behavior based on organizational image theory”, Keybernets, Vol.30, No.2,.
- Terry Bahill (2003). ”The decision analysis and resolution”, University of Arizona.
- Turban, Efraim & Anderson (2001). Jay E.,”Decision Support System and Intelligent Systems”, 6th Edition, Prentice Hall.
- Zsambok, Caroline E. (1992). Beach, Lee Roy, Klein, Gary,”A literature review of analytical and naturalistic decision making”, Final technical report, Klein association inc. 
  • Receive Date: 21 March 2014
  • Accept Date: 21 March 2014