Two-factor model of utility-disutility; A study of Quran in managerial approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Ali Rezaeian 1
Ali Abdollahi Neysani 2
1 Faculty member of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant professor of Research Institute of Hawzah and University
10.30497/smt.2018.2568
Abstract
The lack of "Descriptive Models of Human Behaviour" (DMHB) is one the oldest anomalies in behavioral sciences, especially Organizational Behaviour Management. In one side, different sciences demand for this kind of behavior models; and on the other side, modeling the behavior is as difficult as understanding human internal situations and his environmental complexity. DMHB are important because they have multi-disciplinary usage (economics, ergonomics, social psychology, management and etc…) , and also DMHB are the necessary foundations for developing prescriptive techniques in controlling and directing human behavior. In this paper we developed new model of human behaviors. This models is identified and explained thorough the deep studies in scientific literature of DMHB and Quran text. Quran in this research is the source of idea to find DMHB; also the guide of explaining DMHB. This model is explained in a scientific standard structure as "Ideal Type of DMHB". In addition, its relations to other renowned theories are discussed. The basic methodology and all the steps of this research in preparing, organizing text, studying, documentation, coding, abstraction and final conclusions are based on qualitative content analysis. Therefore, the "validity" and "Trustworthiness" of research is obtained by three criteria "Credibility", "Dependability" and "Transferability".
Keywords
descriptive model of human behavior
two-factor model of utility-disutility
qualitative content analysis
organizational behaviour management
quran
Subjects
  1. قرآن کریم
  2. انصاریان، حسین. (۱۳۸۳). ترجمه قرآن. قم: انتشارات اسوه.
  3. آلوسی، سید محمود. (1415 ه. ق). روح المعانى فى تفسیر القرآن العظیم و السبع المثانى. بیروت: دار الکتب العلمیه.
  4. زمخشری، محمود. (1407 ه. ق). الکشاف عن حقائق غوامض التنزیل‏. بیروت: دارالکتاب العربی.
  5. شومیکر، پاملا. جی. (1387). نظریه‌سازی در علوم اجتماعی. (م. عبداللهی، مترجم) تهران: انتشارات جامعه شناسان.
  6. صادقی تهرانی، محمد. (1365). الفرقان فى تفسیر القرآن بالقرآن و السنة. قم: انتشارات فرهنگ اسلامی.
  7. طباطبایى، سید محمد حسین. (1374 ه. ش. ). ترجمه تفسیر المیزان‏. (س. موسوى همدانى‏، مترجم) قم‏: دفتر انتشارات اسلامى جامعه‏ى مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم‏.
  8. طباطبایى‏، سید محمد حسین. (1417 ه. ق. ). المیزان فى تفسیر القرآن‏. قم‏: دفتر انتشارات اسلامى جامعه‏ى مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم‏.
  9. طبرسی، فضل بن حسن. (1360). مجمع البیان فى تفسیر القرآن‏. (ر. ستوده، مترجم) تهران: انتشارات فراهانی.
  10. فخر رازی، محمد بن عمر. (1420 ه. ق). التفسیر الکبیر (مفاتیح الغیب). بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
  11. فقیهی، سید ابوالحسن. (1376). تئوری و شبه تئوری :چه نوشته‌ای را می‌توان تئوری خواند. اقتصاد و مدیریت - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
  12. لسانی فشارکی، محمدعلی و مرادی زنجانی، حسین. (1391). روش تحقیق موضوعی در قرآن کریم. قم: بوستان کتاب.
  13. مصطفوی، حسن. (1430 ه. ق. ). التحقیق فى کلمات القرآن الکریم‏ (نسخه 4). بیروت، لبنان: دار الکتب العلمیة- مرکز نشر آثار علامه مصطفوی‏.
  14. نیومن، لاورنس. (1389). شیوه‌های پژوهش اجتماعی: رویکردهای کمّی و کیفی. (ح. دانایی فرد، و س. ح. کاظمی، مترجم) تهران: نشر مهربان.

انگلیسی

  1. Baran, S. J. , & Davis, D. K. (1995). Mass communication theory; foundations, ferment, and future (4th ed. ). Wadsworth Pub. Co.
  2. Carlile, P. R. , & Christensen, C. M. (2005 , February). The Cycles of Theory Building in Management Research. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 05-057.
  3. Chandan, J. (2005). Organizational Behaviour (3rd ed. ). Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
  4. Griffin, R. W. , & Moorhead, G. (1986). Organizational behavior. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  5. Hersey, P. , & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (third ed. ). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  6. Jansen, A. , & Samuel, M. (2014). Achievement of Organisational Goals and Motivation of Middle Level Managers within the Context of the Two-Factor Theory. Mediterranean Journal Of Social Sciences. doi:10. 5901/mjss. 2014. v5n16p53
  7. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 93 (5) , 1449-1475. doi:10. 1257/000282803322655392
  8. Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80 (4) , 237-251. doi:10. 1037/h0034747
  9. Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47 (2) , 263. doi:10. 2307/1914185
  10. Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York: Russell sage Foundation.
  11. Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Chandler.
  12. Maidani, E. (1991). Comparative study of Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory of job satisfaction among public and private sectors. Public Personnel Management, 20 (4) , 441-448. doi:10. 1177/009102609102000405
  13. Nadler, D. , & Tushman, M. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9 (2) , 35-51. doi:10. 1016/0090-2616 (80) 90039-x
  14. Olguín, D. O. , Gloor, P. A. , & Pentland, A. (2009). Capturing Individual and Group Behavior with Wearable Sensors. AAAI Spring Symposium: Human Behavior Modeling, 68-74.
  15. Robbins, S. , & Judge, T. (2013). Organizational behavior (15th ed. ). Boston: Pearson.
  16. Severin, W. J. , & Tankard, J. W. (1997). Communication theories: Origins, Methods, and uses in the mass media (4th ed. ). New York: Longman.
  17. Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185 (4157) , 1124-1131. doi:10. 1126/science. 185. 4157. 1124
  18. Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. J BUS, 59 (S4) , S251. doi:10. 1086/296365
  19. Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty, 5 (4) , 297-323. doi:10. 1007/bf00122574
  20. Zhang, Y. , & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed. ) , Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 308-319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Strategic Management Thought
Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 24
September 2018
Pages 18-55

  • Receive Date 20 April 2016
  • Revise Date 16 August 2016
  • Accept Date 12 December 2016