Maturity-Based Corporate Parenting Strategy: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Parent-Subsidiary Relationships

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
Jalil delkhah
Assistant Professor, Management Studies and Technology Development Center, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
10.30497/smt.2026.249547.3689
Abstract
This article presents a novel framework for differentiating corporate parenting strategies based on subsidiary organizational maturity. While corporate parenting literature extensively documents parenting advantage (Campbell et al., 1994; Goold & Campbell, 1987), a significant gap exists in understanding how parenting approaches should adapt to subsidiaries' capability development. This research integrates Capability Maturity Models with corporate parenting theory, emphasizing the distinction between organizational maturity (capability and process development) and organizational age (temporal passage).

We propose four maturity levels with differentiated parenting strategies: (1) Nascent Maturity requires intensive directive parenting; (2) Developing Maturity benefits from supportive-developmental parenting; (3) Established Maturity operates best under strategic oversight; and (4) Advanced Maturity requires minimal intervention. We discuss moderating factors and present propositions for empirical testing.

This framework offers three contributions. First, it extends corporate parenting theory by establishing the first explicit link between subsidiary maturity and parenting strategy. Second, it introduces developmental readiness distinct from age and life cycle. Third, it enriches subsidiary evolution literature through evolutionary parenting pathways. For practitioners, this framework provides operational guidance for assessing subsidiary maturity and designing appropriate parenting approaches.
Keywords
Organizational Maturity
Corporate Parenting Strategy
Parenting Advantage
Parent-Subsidiary Relationships
Corporate Strategy
Capability Development
Subjects
Adizes, I. (1979). Organizational passages—Diagnosing and treating lifecycle problems of organizations. Organizational Dynamics. 8 (1). 3-25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(79)90001-9
Adizes, I. K. (1988). Corporate lifecycles: How and why corporations grow and die and what to do about it. Prentice Hall.
Andrews, D. S., Fainshmidt, S., Fitza, M., & Kundu, S. (2023). Disentangling the corporate effect on subsidiary performance. Strategic Management Journal. 44 (12). 2986-3011.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3530
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 17 (1). 99-120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Belenzon, S., Lee, H., & Patacconi, A. (2019). The architecture of attention: Group structure and subsidiary autonomy. Strategic Management Journal. 40 (10). 1627-1652.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3059
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review. 23 (4). 773-795.
https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.1255638
Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. (1998). Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal. 19 (3). 221-241.
 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094097
Burgelman, R. A., & Shankar, S. S. (2024). Fading corporate survival prospects: Impact of co-selection bias in resource allocation on strategic intent. Strategic Management Journal. 45 (3). 467-498.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3652
Campbell, A., Goold, M., & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate-level strategy: Creating value in the multibusiness company. John Wiley & Sons.
Campbell, A., Goold, M., & Alexander, M. (1995). Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage. Harvard Business Review. 73 (2). 120-132.
Ciabuschi, F., Holm, U., & Martín Martín, O. (2021). Agency controls and subsidiary strategic initiatives: The mediating role of subsidiary autonomy. International Business Review. 30 (3). 101829.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101829
Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1997). Corporate strategy: Resources and the scope of the firm. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (2005). Corporate strategy: A resource-based approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Collis, D. J., Young, D., & Goold, M. (2007). The size, structure, and performance of corporate headquarters. Strategic Management Journal. 28 (4). 383-405.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.595
Curtis, B., Hefley, W. E., & Miller, S. A. (2001). People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0 (Technical Report CMU/SEI-2001-MM-001). Software Engineering Institute. Carnegie Mellon University.
https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6581879.v1
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review. 22 (1). 20-47.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review. 14 (1). 57-74.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
Feldman, E. R. (2021). The corporate parenting advantage, revisited. Strategic Management Journal. 42 (1). 114-143.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3218
Geleilate, J. M. G., Andrews, D. S., & Fainshmidt, S. (2020). Subsidiary autonomy and subsidiary performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of World Business. 55 (4). 101049.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101049
Goold, M. (1990). The paradox of strategic controls. Strategic Management Journal. 11 (1). 43-57.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110104
Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (1987). Strategies and styles: The role of the centre in managing diversified corporations. Basil Blackwell.
Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (2002). Parenting in complex structures. Long Range Planning. 35 (3). 219-243.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00052-3
Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1998). Corporate strategy and parenting theory. Long Range Planning. 31 (2). 308-314.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00017-X
Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Luchs, K. (1993a). Strategies and styles revisited: Strategic planning and financial control. Long Range Planning. 26 (1). 49-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90077-S
Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Luchs, K. (1993b). Strategies and styles revisited: 'Strategic control'—Is it tenable? Long Range Planning. 26 (6). 54-61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90206-U
Greiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review. 50 (4). 37-46.
Henderson, B. D. (1970). The product portfolio. BCG Perspectives. Boston Consulting Group.
Hillson, D. (2001). Benchmarking organizational project management capability. Paper presented at PMI Annual Seminars & Symposium. Nashville. TN. Project Management Institute.
Humphrey, W. S. (1989). Managing the software process. Addison-Wesley Professional.
IIA Norway. (2022). Maturity model for governance (1st ed.). The Institute of Internal Auditors Norway.
Iqbal, S. (2005). A unified strategic view of organizational maturity. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2005—EMEA, Edinburgh, Scotland. Project Management Institute.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3 (4). 305-360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. 12 (1). 1-47.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211
Lee, J., Lee, D., & Kang, S. (2007). An overview of the Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM). In K. C. Chang et al. (Eds.), Advances in web and network technologies, and information management (pp. 384-395). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72909-9_42
Menz, M., Kunisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Collis, D. J., Foss, N. J., Hoskisson, R. E., & Prescott, J. E. (2021). Corporate strategy and the theory of the firm in the digital age. Journal of Management Studies. 58 (7). 1695-1720.
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12760
Menz, M., Kunisch, S., & Collis, D. J. (2015). The corporate headquarters in the contemporary corporation: Advancing a multimarket firm perspective. Academy of Management Annals. 9 (1). 633-714.
https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1027050
Meyer, K. E., Li, C., & Schotter, A. P. J. (2020). Managing the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies. 51 (4). 538-576.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00318-w
Negron, L. A., Quispe, G., Serrano, F., & Bautista, L. (2020). Relationship between quality management practices, performance and maturity quality management, a contingency approach. Quality Management Journal. 27 (4). 205-224.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2020.1809582
Object Management Group. (2008). Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM), Version 1.0 (OMG Document Number: formal/2008-06-01). Object Management Group.
Padma, P., Ganesh, L. S., & Rajendran, C. (2008). An exploratory study of the impact of the Capability Maturity Model on the organizational performance of Indian software firms. Quality Management Journal. 15 (2). 20-34.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2008.11918064
Paulk, M., Curtis, W., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. (1993). Capability Maturity Model for Software (Version 1.1) (Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-024). Software Engineering Institute. Carnegie Mellon University.
https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6575027.v1
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1978)
Porter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review. 65 (3). 43-59.
Project Management Institute. (2003). Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3®) (3rd ed.). Project Management Institute.
Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science. 29 (1). 33-51.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.1.33
Simons, R. (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Management Journal. 12 (1). 49-62.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120105
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press.
Simons, R. (1995). Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard Business Review. 73 (2). 80-88.
Suskandari, D., Wibowo, M., Suyoko, & Wahyuni, S. (2025). The role of corporate parenting strategy: Managing complexity and fostering performance in the multi-business unit. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. 6 (1). 101-111.
https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art10
Tarhan, A., Turetken, O., & Reijers, H. A. (2016). Business process maturity models: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology. 75. 122-134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.010
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 18 (7), 509-533.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
TenBrink, C., & Gelb, B. (2017). When firms mature: Keeping the ho-hum at bay and embracing change. Journal of Business Strategy. 38 (5). 12-17.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-07-2016-0079
Van Looy, A. (2014). Business process maturity: A comparative study on a sample of business process maturity models. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04202-2
Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., & Poels, G. (2014). Choosing the right business process maturity model. Information & Management. 51 (4). 466-488.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.06.002
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 5 (2). 171-180.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207

  • Receive Date 29 November 2025
  • Revise Date 25 January 2026
  • Accept Date 18 January 2026